|
|
|
This article originally appeared in
the August 2005 Harvard Mental Health Letter and is provided courtesy
of Harvard
Health Publications.
Magnetic stimulation of the brain: An update
In recent decades, scientists have developed electrical
and magnetic devices for observing the brain in action — remembering,
deciding, experiencing emotion — in ways that were once unimaginable.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy
(MRS) are among the most revolutionary of these techniques. Changing brain
activity in any meaningful or lasting way by electromagnetic means has proved
more difficult, but glimmers of progress are appearing.
The chief established electromagnetic technique used in psychiatry is
electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), in which a strong electrical current applied
to the scalp induces generalized seizures (spreading to the whole brain)
for the relief of severe intractable depression and other psychiatric disorders.
The treatment is highly effective but produces short-term confusion and
occasionally some memory loss. Patients often must be hospitalized and always
require general anesthesia and muscle relaxants.
Less disruptive alternatives may now be provided by a group of techniques
involving magnetic stimulation that are coming into wider use.
Repetitive TMS
A growing body of research suggests that the best known of these techniques,
transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may be a weapon against depression,
schizophrenia, and other psychiatric disorders.
It works this way: An electrical generator operating in very short on–off
bursts produces a series of strong magnetic fields in a wire coil, generally
in the shape of a figure 8, that is mounted on a paddle and positioned on
or near a patient’s forehead or scalp. Unlike electrical currents,
magnetic fields are not absorbed and scattered by the bone of the skull — the
reason high voltages are required for ECT. The fluctuating magnetic force
penetrates to a depth of about an inch, producing an electrical current
that influences neurons in the area directly under the coil. The signals
do not reach subcortical brain regions but may eventually be used to change
activity in some of these regions via connections that are now being mapped.
Researchers are also experimenting with different types and numbers of coils
to achieve deeper penetration.
Stimulation by TMS is much milder and more localized than ECT. The magnetic
field can be applied to fully conscious patients, who feel no pain; at most,
they notice a slight clicking or pinching sensation. They can read or talk
during the treatment and drive themselves home afterward. Memory is not
affected. Single pulses have no reported side effects; repetitive TMS can
cause muscle tension headaches, which are usually mild and easily treated
with aspirin. Accidental seizures, a rare complication, have not been reported
since safety guidelines were clarified in the mid-1990s. In animal studies,
rats receiving TMS weekly for as long as three months suffered no learning
or memory impairment.
With more powerful apparatus now available, TMS can be administered at
frequencies up to 60 cycles a second (60 Hz). Although there is considerable
individual variation, lower-frequency signals apparently lower blood flow
and suppress activity in the cerebral cortex, while higher-frequency signals,
above 20 Hz, have the opposite effect. By varying the frequency of the pulse
and the position of the coil, researchers can turn different brain regions
on and off and study how they are involved in vision, motor control, memory,
attention, and language.
For example, by placing the coil over the motor cortex, they can make
a thumb twitch or a leg jerk to learn more about how the brain controls
the body’s muscles. They can also temporarily block or enhance some
aspect of vision or speech. Previously, the only way to stimulate small
regions of the brain directly was to apply electrodes during surgery.
Treating mood disorders
The main psychiatric use of TMS is in the treatment of depression. For
this purpose, therapists usually place the coil over the left prefrontal
cortex, just behind the forehead, where fMRI and other brain scans suggest
that activity is often low in depressed persons. This area, a seat of planning
and decision-making, is linked to the emotional centers in the limbic system.
Typically, high-frequency magnetic impulses are applied for a half-hour
a day five days a week for about two weeks — in some cases, up to
six weeks. Researchers have also been experimenting with low-frequency TMS
directed at the right prefrontal cortex.
Although results are still inconsistent, the news from what now amounts
to a large number of controlled studies is getting better. For example,
in one study, high-frequency TMS directed at the left prefrontal cortex
combined with low-frequency TMS to the right prefrontal cortex improved
depression in patients who had not responded to drugs. Researchers have
also found TMS helpful as a weekly maintenance treatment for adults with
bipolar depression who were taking lithium. And interestingly, high-frequency
TMS to the right prefrontal cortex may improve symptoms of bipolar mania.
Results of direct comparisons with ECT have been conflicting, but in
one study, patients not helped by antidepressant medications who received
five sessions a week of TMS for four weeks did as well as those who received
similar ECT treatment.
Over all, about 40% of patients with medication-resistant depression
have shown some improvement after TMS. In two small studies, TMS reduced
depressive symptoms by 28%; sham (placebo) treatments, in which the paddle
was angled to misdirect the magnetic energy, reduced symptoms by only 7%.
Research also suggests that TMS may shorten the time it takes drugs to begin
working. Researchers are collaborating on a large rigorous study in which
more than 200 patients at 14 sites will receive either TMS or sham treatment,
so we may soon have a better idea of its safety and effectiveness.
Schizophrenia
Although ECT is an established treatment for severe schizophrenic symptoms
as well as depression, there are few studies of TMS in schizophrenia. Some
trials have been disappointing, but there are conflicting reports that TMS
can banish hallucinatory voices. In a small study, researchers found that
two out of three patients who received low-frequency TMS directed at the
auditory region of the cortex stayed free of threatening and abusive voices
for more than two weeks — one of them for two months. None responded
to sham TMS.
These results were confirmed in another study. Seven out of ten schizophrenic
patients who received low-frequency TMS responded, and five of them maintained
the improvement for at least two months. In still another (uncontrolled)
study, four weeks of TMS produced an improvement in the negative or deficit
symptoms of schizophrenia — apathy, emotional constriction, limited
speech — that lasted at least a month. But hallucinations and delusions
were not affected.
Other conditions
Findings are mixed. Some reports suggest that TMS can relieve the symptoms
of post-traumatic stress disorder at least for short periods. In a controlled
study, TMS was no more effective than sham treatment for patients with obsessive-compulsive
disorder. More than 30 studies are under way in the United States testing
the potential of TMS in a variety of conditions including stroke, Parkinson’s
disease, and cerebral palsy.
Magnetic seizure therapy
Researchers are exploring new ways of using the TMS apparatus — delivering
magnetic fields at a frequency high enough to cause seizures. Magnetically
induced seizures, unlike those produced by ECT, are localized rather than
general. In theory, they could be directed where they would do the most
good and the least harm — avoiding areas critical for memory, for
example. But like ECT, magnetic seizure therapy (MST) requires general anesthesia,
which increases risk and expense. And because the frequency has to be high,
it also requires a more powerful machine than TMS.
MST has been tested in both monkeys and humans, and the preliminary results
suggest that it might be effective, with fewer side effects than ECT. In
a study under way in 2005, patients have been assigned at random to receive
first ECT and then MST or the reverse, with follow-ups after two and six
months. Direct comparisons among MST, ECT, and conventional TMS may incidentally
help determine whether the generalized seizures produced by ECT are necessary
for relieving intractable depression or are only a byproduct of some other,
more specific change that supplies the therapeutic effect.
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Transcranial magnetic stimulation is not the only magnetic technique
that has shown some promise in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (MRS), which uses magnetic fields to map brain chemistry,
is best known as a research tool that provides new information about the
structure and activity of living cells. The magnetic field involved is weaker
than the field generated by TMS but penetrates the whole brain uniformly.
In a study reported in 2004, researchers serendipitously found that a form
of MRS they were using to examine the brains of depressed patients improved
the symptoms of depression, at least for a few days. A comparison with sham
treatment confirmed the result.
These findings from a single study with a brief follow-up need confirmation,
but there is further evidence from animal experiments. The subjects were
rats forced to swim for hours with no possibility of escape. This situation
often leads to learned helplessness, a state resembling human depression.
Rats given a form of magnetic resonance spectroscopy before forced swimming
took longer to give up hope; antidepressant drugs have the same effect.
As of mid-2005, the FDA has not approved magnetic stimulation of the
brain for the treatment of any psychiatric condition, and research is
just beginning. Many questions are open, and many paths remain to be
explored. In therapy, which patients will respond best, and how do individual
brain
structure and function affect the response? (One early study found that
depression in patients with a preference for the left visual field, controlled
by the right hemisphere of the brain, did not respond to TMS in the left
hemisphere). Do high-frequency and low-frequency TMS affect different
types
of depression? What is the best timing, how long should treatment continue
(there is some evidence that more than two weeks may be better), and
what is the best placement of the magnetic coil? How long does the antidepressant
effect last?
Further research could also advance early diagnosis of depression and
other disorders, help to predict their course, and possibly identify the
best medication or other treatment for a given patient. And magnetic stimulation
might be used in combination with magnetic resonance imaging and other brain
scanning techniques to investigate how different brain regions are coordinated
and why coordination fails.
References
Cohen H, et al. “Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Right
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Double-Blind,
Placebo-Controlled Study,” American Journal of Psychiatry (March 2004):
Vol. 161, No. 3, pp. 515–24.
Haraldsson HM, et al. “Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Investigation
and Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Review,” Schizophrenia Research (Nov.
1, 2004): Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 1–16.
Lisanby SH, et al. “New Developments in Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic
Seizure Therapy,” CNS Spectrum (July 2003): Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 529–36.
Martin JL, et al. “Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the
Treatment of Depression. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” British
Journal of Psychiatry (June 2003): Vol. 182, pp. 480–91.
Schulze-Rauschenbach SC, et al. “Distinctive Neurocognitive Effects of
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroconvulsive Therapy in
Major Depression,” British Journal of Psychiatry (May 2005): Vol. 186,
pp. 410–16.
For more references, please see www.health.harvard.edu/mentalextra. |
|
 |
|
 |