|
|
 |
Studies in progress: Leader reflects on a decade
at HMI
This year marks the tenth anniversary of Harvard Medical
International. Founded in 1994 by Daniel Tosteson, MD, then the dean
of Harvard Medical School, HMI was created to extend the School’s
mission internationally. In a decade, HMI has had more than 50 programs
in over
40 countries.
In this HMI World feature, Robert K. Crone, MD, president and CEO of
HMI, talks about HMI’s growth and progress, and discusses the challenges
that lie ahead.
HMI WORLD: As we arrive at the end of HMI’s tenth year, where
does Harvard Medical International fit in the context of global health?
 |
| Robert K. Crone, MD |
CRONE: When many people think of global health, they think of, one, public
health initiatives related to creating and carrying out policy, and two,
grassroots efforts. At HMI we are positioned right in the middle, and this
embodies the missions of Harvard University and Harvard Medical School,
which both call for the creation of new knowledge and communities that continue
to learn.
Our vision—that “No citizen of the world should need to leave
their own community to access high quality health care”—has
remained a constant throughout the decade. With the successful implementation
of HMI’s programs in medical and health education and health systems
development, we have striven to keep this vision foremost in our minds.
HMI WORLD: What are the major trends influencing the services and partnerships
of HMI?
CRONE: Since the beginning of HMI, there has been a developing realization
that government cannot provide all things to all people with regard to health
care. Even in places where the government has traditionally held a monopoly,
the private sector must play a role.
In China, India, and the United Arab Emirates, for the example, the governments,
instead of continuing to provide all of the care, are fostering the development
of alternatives in the private sector. The governments are transitioning
to a stewardship role wherein they act as a regulator and arbitrator
between the three points on the health care triangle: providers, patients,
and payers.
This frees the government to regulate hospital standards and serve as
a steward for patient safety. The same trend can be seen in medical education.
The impetus for curriculum reform in Germany was that the government
put
the universities in the position of having to compete with one another.
This shift to the private sector has underscored the need for health
care management training. This is a concern felt both locally and internationally,
but with our international partners in particular we are seeing a focus
on helping physicians develop their capabilities as executives. Whereas
in the past they mainly had a need to acquire and update their clinical
knowledge, physicians are now focusing on cost-efficiency, patient safety,
and consumer satisfaction, and how these metrics affect their bottom line.
The programs of the Harvard Macy Institute have been very successful at
addressing that, and these issues have also found a forum with Practi-Med.
The leadership of our partner institutions understand that, with today’s
health care consumer more knowledgeable and discerning than ever before,
quality will be the single most important differentiator of their services.
Our partners in India, for example, are focused on quality and performance
improvement initiatives that will help them to control costs, thereby
making their services as affordable as possible for more people.
 |
| From left to right: Mehul Mehta, James White, and
Norman MacLeod of HMI discuss strategy. |
HMI WORLD: How do you trace HMI’s evolution over the past
decade? In other words, what can you point to in order to show how HMI
has moved
from its startup phase to where we are now?
CRONE: The obvious measure that comes to mind is our growth as an organization.
We now have a Boston-based staff of 46 people, plus a landed team of
eight in Dubai.
Another way to look at the evolution of HMI is to look
at how some of our partnerships have evolved. In the beginning, HMI’s relationship
with Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute was focused
mostly on creating student exchange opportunities. Today, we are working
with SRMCRI through both our education and health systems divisions, have
broadened the scope of our objectives, and share some fairly ambitious goals
in the areas of curriculum development, quality management, HIV education
and international hospital accreditation. And that expansion of the partnership
reflects not only SRMCRI’s emergence as a leader in medical education
and health care delivery in India, but also our own development in terms
of what we can offer over the life of a partnership.
The depth and breadth of our strategic collaboration with Dubai Healthcare
City is another indicator of our progress as an organization. This partnership
touches every corner of HMI, and calls upon so much of our past experiences
and areas of expertise. That we have been able to deliver on our objectives
there to date, I think, speaks well of HMI’s versatility and capacity.
HMI WORLD: Going forward, how will the focus of HMI shift, if at all?
What areas or challenges will receive more attention?
CRONE: Notwithstanding any shifts in the focus of our
work, we must remember that we have arrived at this point, after ten years,
because we have
worked to learn from each project and experience. After more than 50
programs, our position is still the same—that we aren’t offering our partners
the only approach to meeting their objectives; rather, we’re working
with them to identify the approach or strategy that is most suitable
for them. That philosophy has to stay in the foreground.
We always need to be thinking about how we can better understand and
work with health care policymakers as well as those involved in grassroots
efforts. It is in that milieu where we have the most potential to bring
different resources together, to spark collaborations between key stakeholders,
and make a contribution that creates sustainable progress.
HMI WORLD: How has HMI’s approach to developing program activity
changed or evolved?
CRONE: One of our most important achievements over the past ten years
has been to create replicable models that benefit our partners because they
enable us to do our work less expensively. Tom Aretz (vice president for
education) and Harvey Makadon (vice president of health systems) have codified
what we do in education and health systems. In our alliances focused on
reforming curricula and developing faculty, for example, we have learned
to systematically approach a set of problems, and recognize standard approaches
that translate in different areas. Over the years we have improved at learning
from our experiences, and therefore been able to develop applicable modules
and tools for our partners.
HMI WORLD: How has HMI evolved its capability to determine what our partners
need and how best to help them?
CRONE: We have developed assessment tools that help us better identify
our partners needs, which tend to be at the systems and administrative levels.
Also, when structuring a partnership, we take the long-term view and impress
upon them that they must create a strategic vision and overarching strategy
in order to be successful.
 |
 |
| Program coordinators like Michael Kavanagh, Ryan Wildes, and Kristen
Mitchell play a critical part in HMI’s partnerships and programs. |
HMI WORLD: What is it about the people at HMI that makes them suited
to this kind of work?
CRONE: The people of HMI are curious by nature. They are all very accomplished
at home but interested in the world outside of the Harvard community. They
are comfortable challenging their own ideas, and see the value of learning
from another place. This characterizes not only the senior staff who are
working abroad, but also the program coordinators who are an important communications
link between HMI, our partners, and the network of faculty with whom we
collaborate.
HMI WORLD: What role has the relationship between HMI and Harvard Medical
School played for both HMI and HMS?
CRONE: First of all, we could not have accomplished what we have without
the unwavering support of, first, Dean Daniel Tosteson, and now, the past_issues/Nov_Dec_2004
dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Joseph Martin.
Obviously, the ability to tap into the faculty of not only Harvard Medical
School, but the other schools in the Harvard University community as
well, has given us an enormous amount of flexibility in responding to
our partners’ needs.
To date approximately 750 members of the Harvard faculty have participated
in HMI programs.
But we hope that the benefit extends in both directions. It became clear
very early that HMI could offer faculty at Harvard Medical School unique
opportunities to go abroad, not only to teach, but to learn as well.
By participating in HMI’s programs, these faculty help to broaden
their own perspectives and the worldview of the faculty as a whole.
HMI WORLD: How can HMI be a resource for people in the academic community
with an interest in global health care initiatives?
CRONE: One of our objectives going forward is to more rigorously study
what we do to create new knowledge for ourselves and for the world. Part
of this pursuit of our academic mission is the global health seminar that
we organized through the Department of Social Medicine. That series of discussions
is a way for us to bring together some of our experiences and knowledge.
There is great potential for us to contribute something unique on the
academic front. HMI is a petri dish to test out academic ideas. Together
with our partners, we teach, train, and develop strategies for delivering
health care and education, and we implement these strategies, so we are
not working at the theoretical level.
HMI WORLD: What are HMI’s greatest challenges going forward?
CRONE: Demand is growing for what we do and others are emulating us.
We will be challenged to continue to expand what we’re doing and how
we’re doing it, but at the same time, we must have the discipline
to critically evaluate true measures of success, and remain true to the
mission of Harvard Medical School: to create and nurture a community
of the best people committed to leadership in alleviating human suffering
caused by disease.
|
 |
|
 |