|
|
 |
Wockhardt, excelling behind new quality assurance
infrastructure, eyes accreditation
The Indian health care industry is undergoing a period
of transformation, marked by increased competition, a heightened focus on
quality and performance
improvement, and the rapid growth of the private health care sector.
Wockhardt Hospitals, Ltd. has already established itself as one of the leading
health
care organizations in India, but now, with help from HMI, Wockhardt’s
leadership have set their sights on establishing a strong reputation
internationally.
“Since HMI first began working with Wockhardt to establish new hospitals,
we have been operating with the view that quality management needed to
be one of the key components,” said Dr. Harvey Makadon, HMI vice president
for health systems. “Wockhardt wants to be the first hospital in India
to be accredited by Joint Commission International (JCI), but beyond
that, and perhaps more importantly, the leadership have a real commitment
to quality
of care and excellence in customer service.”
 |
| The Mulund facility staff is using a new health information system
to track patient data. |
Wockhardt Heart Hospital in Mulund (Mumbai), which opened
in July 2002, is the scene of the organization’s efforts to gain international
accreditation. HMI and Wockhardt are continuing a process begun in May 2003,
when the partners
initiated the development of a Performance Improvement Plan designed
to help create a sustainable quality improvement model for the hospital
that
was aligned with the vision and values of Wockhardt. A Care and Quality
Improvement Council made up of representatives from various areas of
the hospital is driving the implementation of the plan. Committees have
been
formed to focus on different aspects of quality and patient care, such
as infection control, health information management, patient safety, and
clinical
quality performance indicators.
Sharon Kleefield, HMI director of health care quality, said the leadership
of Wockhardt have made considerable progress implementing the Performance
Improvement Plan and its associated committees and project teams. “They
are focused on defining the processes and specific outcome measures for
care of patients as they move throughout the various departmental functions
of the hospital, and on establishing a process for reviewing these processes
and measures in order to address shortcomings in the quality management
system.”
It should be emphasized that instituting these measures is about more
than simply imposing a system and playing according to its rules—systemic
changes are, first and foremost, changes in behavior and attitude. Wockhardt
is taking major steps toward empowering its staff to take active roles in
the hospital’s progress, with the Performance Improvement Plan serving
merely as the mechanism to support dialogue about what changes are in
order, help the staff to develop an approach to driving change, and provide
a structure
to guide the implementation of changes.
Dr. Lloyd Nazareth, general manager of Wockhardt Heart Hospital, has
been a champion of Wockhardt’s quality improvement efforts since the
beginning. “Today’s Indian health care consumer is more knowledgeable
and discerning than ever before. We believe that in the next decade these
consumers will determine the success or failure of our hospitals,” he
said. “Quality will be the single most important differentiator of
our services. Quality and performance improvement initiatives will also
help us to control costs, thereby making our services as affordable as
possible for more people.”
Immediate improvements—and a course
for sustainable progress
 |
| Nurses play a key role in the quality management
efforts at Mulund. |
An HMI team visited the Mulund hospital in January and
came away impressed by the level of enthusiasm and commitment of the Wockhardt
staff. Although
the hospital has increased its volume, staff, and clinical specialties
over the past year, it is still small and manageable enough to allow
the leadership
to shape hospital practices for the long term. HMI and Wockhardt see
the performance improvement work being undertaken at Mulund as the model
for
other Wockhardt hospitals, including facilities in Bangalore and Kolkata. “We
envision a consistent network approach for continuously improving patient
care,” said Kleefield.
HMI is helping Wockhardt to measure its performance improvements—and
the related quality control mechanisms—against the very detailed and
comprehensive standards established by the JCI, the world’s most recognized
international accreditor of hospitals (see sidebar). This process involves
not only understanding the standards and putting these criteria in place
in the hospital, but also communicating new quality management protocols
across the organization, providing appropriate training to enable not
only dailyimprovement but also continuous review, and ensuring that
the right
outcome indicators are in place to measure success.
“Using the JCI standards to guide improvements in the Wockhardt hospitals
makes sense, not only because of the immediate progress it allows, but
also because the standards provide a context for ongoing education for the leadership
and staff about how to achieve the highest level of patient care,” said
Makadon. “However, because JCI accreditation is a lengthy process,
we have to recognize the value of prioritizing the different metrics
of performance improvement in order to improve care today. HMI and our
colleagues at Wockhardt are continually putting our heads together to
answer some
important
time-sensitive questions: What needs to be addressed now? What mechanisms
need to be created? Where do gaps exist in the process?”
 |
| Quality and safety in the operating room is just one focus of the
Care and Quality Improvement Council. |
A committed team effort
For Nazareth and his staff, the first task was to unite the core management
and clinical teams around the goal of building the quality infrastructure.
It’s a time-intensive program that demands a lot from the staff, but
as Nazareth pointed out, this group is now very motivated to make JCI accreditation—and
the benefits of high-quality patient care—a reality. “JCI accreditation
would, first of all, put a stamp of approval on all of our efforts over
the last two years to build an institution that does not compromise on quality,
safety, and ethics,” he said. “We hope to be ready for a mock
drill by the end of the year, and then we should be ready for the actual
accreditation by the middle of 2005. This will mean a lot of work for
all the members of our staff, particularly the core group of 25 Quality
Champions
we have trained.”
Over the next few months, the Mulund quality team will be working to
establish patient safety systems in areas like medication, infection control,
and emergency medicine. They are also designing a formal competency assessment
system for all staff, as well as a training program to support ongoing professional
development.
A group of Quality Champions will initiate patient education and information
initiatives, and the hospital will continue training all staff in patient
relationship management and customer service skills. “Our medium term
goal is to be recognized as the best provider of quality health care
in Mulund by the end of 2005,” said
Nazareth.
|
 |
The handbook of the Joint Commission International (JCI)
Accreditation program is thick with detail, with the very
fine points of what hospitals should strive for laid out in the jargon
of quality: standards,
benchmarks, metrics, compliance. During a recent visit to
HMI, Dr. John Helfrick cut through the bullet points and explained that
JCI accreditation
is not only a process for raising the standard of care provided
by hospitals, but also of energizing the people within them.
“Accreditation is about human nature. There have to be standards,
and there must be people coming around to see that you are
meeting them,” said
Helfrick, who consults with organizations about quality improvement
for JCI. International recognition is closely intertwined with obtaining
accreditation
through the JCI. “JCI’s mission is to develop and review patient-centered
standards that are culturally adaptable, as well as a process
that stimulates improvement.”
The JCI is a division of Joint Commission Resources, the
subsidiary of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
(JCAHO). JCAHO was formed in 1951 to oversee accreditation of hospitals
in the United States, and in 1997 JCI was established with the mission of
accrediting hospitals outside the U.S. American accreditation standards
were judged inappropriate internationally, leading to the creation of an
international task force that by 1999 had completed the first set of standards
to guide hospital improvement. To date, the JCI has accredited 55 hospitals
in 13 countries.
JCI defines a standard as a statement of expectation that
defines the structures and processes that must be substantially in place
in an organization to enhance the quality of care. Helfrick points out that
JCI’s accreditation philosophy is focused on maximum, not minimum
standards. JCI’s goal is not to force the closure of hospitals that
fail to make the grade (JCI is not a regulator), but rather to identify
hospitals that need improvement and help them to develop strategies for
doing so.
JCI’s hospital standards are organized around important functions
within the hospital, and designed to be interpreted (and reviewed by JCI
accreditors) within the culture and legal frameworks of a given country.
The standards are divided into Patient-Centered and Health Care Organization
Management standards. Patient-centered standards measure access to care
and continuity of care, patient and family rights, patient assessment, patient
care, and patient and family education. The hospital itself is judged by
its demonstrated commitment to quality improvement and patient safety, prevention
and control of infection, governance and leadership, facility management
and safety, staff qualifications and management, and information management.
Hospital standards are also divided between “core“ or threshold
standards that all organizations must meet to be accredited, and “reach” standards
that guide better practice. During a three to five-day survey process, JCI’s
accreditors assign scores to the hospital in these areas.
Standards, measures, and aggregate scores—but again accreditation
depends on people. “An organization preparing to seek accreditation
must be open and honest about its strengths and weaknesses,” said
Helfrick. “Excellence depends on creating a blameless culture. Too
often, individuals are blamed for errors when the flaw is really in the
system. This discourages error reporting, and therefore contributes to a
faulty view of where an organization is and what it needs to do to improve.”
For more information about JCI accreditation, visit the Joint
Commission Resources website at www.jcrinc.org.
|
|
|
 |